I have puzzled over some issues with new works, and I’m just going to put up a few questions here. I am not being sarcastic. Really. I’m just curious about some issues.
Recently one of my students was given a suggestion. A composer of a new work thought the student might consider playing the composer’s new work on a plastic oboe reed. This was one thing that got me going on this. Another is that, some years ago, I played a wrong note in a new work (no, I didn’t do it on purpose). The composer didn’t have a clue. Another time we were doing a new work and a musician asked the composer a question about a note and the composer actually didn’t know which note he wanted. It didn’t really matter to him.
These things just cause me to puzzle over some new music. If it doesn’t matter what note I play, what does matter? What is that work about? If I can play on a plastic oboe reed, what is it about the oboe that is important? It must not be the timbre (believe me, a plastic reed doesn’t sound like a reed of cane). We spend a great deal of time perfecting our craft, working on our tone, intonation, phrasing, technique … you get the idea. And then we sometimes get works where none of that matters at all.
Yes, I find works like that frustrating. But mostly I’m curious what the composer is thinking. If a beginning oboist would be just as fine as one who’s been training for years, what does this mean?